King, victim's mother seek action on art
profits
Friday, May 04, 2007
By SEBASTIAN KITCHEN
Capital Bureau
MONTGOMERY --Attorney General Troy King and the mother of a
murder victim Thursday applauded the House's passage of a bill
this week that would stop criminals from profiting from the sale
of their art and essays, and urged the Senate also to approve
the measure.
"My daughter did not deserve this and neither do any of the
victims who are being violated," said Mary Kate Gach, whose
daughter was brutally murdered in the Birmingham area in 1992 by
Jack Trawick.
Trawick and Daniel Siebert, both convicted of multiple
murders and sitting on Death Row at Holman Correctional Facility
in Escambia County, attracted national attention by posting art
and writings online depicting or discussing their crimes. Some
people purchased the art during online auctions.
"I miss my daughter every single day," said Gach, who thanked
the media for allowing her to talk about her daughter. "I don't
want to remember my daughter this way. I shouldn't have to
defend my daughter 15 years later."
The House approved the bill 91-0 on Wednesday. It would
require a prisoner or a third party to turn over any profits to
the Alabama Board of Adjustments to repay any restitution that
the prisoner still owed. Failure to do so would be a Class C
Felony.
The bill would allow a county attorney or the attorney
general to petition the court to order the defendant to forfeit
the proceeds from sales.
Trawick brutally beat and stabbed Gach's daughter, Stephanie.
He was convicted of the murder of another woman about the same
time and confessed to others.
Siebert was convicted of strangling his hearing-impaired
girlfriend and her two sons, ages 4 and 5, in 1986.
King said demented essays about the crimes and about how to
commit rape and murder began to appear on the Web several years
ago. King said art by serial killers recently started to be sold
during online auctions.
"We set about trying to find ways to stop it," he said.
Gach first heard about the Web sites from a reporter in 2002.
She said her family did not know how to respond, but hired a
lawyer and filed suit against Trawick, the Web master of the
site and officials with the Alabama Department of Corrections.
The Web site was then taken down, Gach said.
She said the family had four years of peace, although never
closure. Similar Web sites, she said, reappeared in 2006.
"I did not read them, I never have," Gach said.
King and the bill's sponsor, Rep. Cam Ward, R-Alabaster, said
the bill seeks to take the profit from the art. Ward said he
believes removing the potential for profit will slow down the
practice and ease the suffering of victims' families.
In addition to any type of art, the bill also covers essays,
memorabilia, items related to the prisoner or crime or any
property that increases in value because of the criminal's
notoriety or infamy.
Gach said the people who purchase the art are "evil."
"It does not speak too well for humanity," she said.
Several states passed notoriety or Son of Sam laws that were
eventually struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court because they
were deemed too broad and overreaching -- violating the First
Amendment rights of prisoners.
Son of Sam refers to serial killer David Berkowitz, who
terrorized New York City during a murder spree in the late
1970s.
King and Ward said their proposal is more narrowly defined
and does not stop the sale of art or other items, but would
prohibit prisoners from collecting the profits.
State Rep. Marc Keahey, D-Grove Hill, introduced a bill that
would have made it a crime to sell art or artistic expressions
related to the artist's crime or victims. Keahey said after the
vote Wednesday that he is supporting Ward's bill. Keahey's bill
remains in the House Judiciary Committee.
Senate Majority Leader Zeb Little, D-Cullman, is the Senate
sponsor of the bill.
Despite fighting in the Senate, Ward encouraged his
colleagues to act quickly and make victims a priority.
"We hope the Senate passes it and it becomes law this
session," he said.
Very few bills have passed through the Senate during a
slowdown by a minority coalition of Republicans and five
Democrats over the operating rules, which they believe are
unfair and will limit debate on budgets.